Just when you thought certain laws of physics were sacred, Ed Seykota comes along with some amazingly simple experiments that violate the supposedly "well-known" Bernoulli Effect. He shows that lift is not a function of fluid velocity, despite almost universal acceptance of the concept. Instead the suction effect that causes lift actually results from changes in the cross sectional area through which a stream of matter flows. "Radial Momentum" is Seykota's term to quantify the change in flow per area. These simple experiments demonstrate that "Radial Momentum" explains lift better than fluid velocity.

This is an example of inductive levitation. Two copper cylinders rotating at high speeds induce currents, which induce magnetic fields, which can levitate a magnet. Reversing the spin direction changes the polarity of the field, and instead causes the magnet to be pulled downward, with a force exceeding gravity. This enchanting demonstration has received over a million views on YouTube.

According to BSM-Supergravitation Unified Theory the mass is not equivalent to matter. It is a measurable parameter of the matter quantity. Therefore, it could be changed by proper modulation of the parameters of the physical vacuum. The unveiled structure of electron and space-time fabrics allowed to predict a unique gravito-inertial effect called Stimulated Anomalous Reaction of Gravity (SARG). It is activated by a Heterodyne Resonance Method, which is invoked by Quantum Mechanical interactions between oscillating ion-electron pairs and the space-time continuum. The SARG effect occurs in properly activated neutral plasma. It has been verified by some experiments. Videoclips and samples of plasma thrusters will be shown.

Field structures are self-sustaining forms involving structural 3-D geometry with chiral action loops, circuitry based on polyhedral relationships, skew torque geometry and knotting. Field structure theory investigates action as a structural continuum arranged in hierarchical orders producing a descriptive three-dimensional geometry with applicable physical relevance.

Can a single experiment disprove Special Relativity? This is exactly what happens in the phenomenon of rotational unipolar induction discovered by Faraday in 1832, a situation in which a wire co-moving with a magnet receives an induced voltage. It denies the need of relative motion between wire and magnet stipulated by Einstein in 1905. Alternative relativistic views, however, propose that the induction occurs not in the co-moving wire but in the rest of the circuit, a highly debatable point. Some relativists even say that General Relativity is needed to solve the problem.

In 1988 I completed a series of experiments, substituting Faraday’s rotating disk and magnet by a filamentary circuit, one portion of which is immersed in a magnetic field (inside a gap between ceramic magnets) while the other remains outside the magnetic field. (The field is confined within iron plates as shown in the figure). By introducing a capacitive branch I could demonstrate that the induction occurs, indeed, in the wire that moves with the magnet, without need of relative motion. A variation of the experiment in rectilinear fashion makes this anti-relativistic conclusion totally unavoidable, invalidating the recourse to General Relativity. Important astrophysical consequences follow.

For many years researchers have been annoyed with, rather than curious about, a natural phenomenon called ball lightning, a sustained spherical circulation of charge. It is usually regarded as a transient effect, resulting from a sudden change in electrical flow, as often happens when flipping a switch. Nikola Tesla was perhaps the first to seriously study the cause and nature of ball lightning. Today it's possible to reproduce this fascinating effect right inside your own microwave oven. Science hobbyist Bill Beaty shows us how.

The "Strobe Effect" we see in a Las Vegas roulette wheel or wagon wheel in an old western may explain much at the fundamental level of particles. In all cases, the interaction between frequencies creates quantum jumps between states. In this model, a charge element is represented by a set of LEDs, strung like Christmas lights, around both a toroid and its torus cross section.  The LEDs fire around the path in a certain time, corresponding to the "inertial frequency" or "self frequency" of a fundamental particle. The mechanical spinning of the toroid wheel corresponds to the rotation of the particle with respect to environment.  The interaction of these two frequencies creates discontinuous "jumps" and a series of resonant "locks", which correspond to the quantum states of the particle. When a particle changes from one state to another, we say that it "absorbed" or "emitted" a photon.

Brown's Gas boasts a plethora of unusual characteristics that defy current chemistry. It has a cool flame of about 130 degrees, yet melts steel, brick and many other materials. Confusingly research both confirms and rebuffs many claims about it, leading to a smorgasbord of theories today seeking to explain its unusual properties. One possible theory, currently gaining support even from establishment science, depicts "plasma orbital expansion of the electron in a water molecule". In this process, unlike electrolysis, the water molecule "bends" into a linear, dipole-free geometry. This linear water molecule expands to gain electrons in the d sub-shell, and these extra electrons produce different effects on different target materials. Electrons that scatter at point of contact produce heat based upon electrical conductivity, density and thermal capacity of the material. This presentation will explain this theory, mathematics and why it is gaining popularity among scientist in academia. It will also compare and contrast other theories, provide reasons why some can't work, and explore some of the mysteries that have yet been solved.

Many researchers have demonstrated anomalous effects with what has become known as the Rodin coil, a particular winding of electrical wire around a toroid form. These inductive anomalies include a displaced magnetic south pole, levitation, and wireless power transmission. Marko Rodin discovered this special geometry from studying number patterns mapped from a two dimensional plane to a closed two-dimensional space with the topology of a doughnut. He claims that these number patterns represent the natural flow of energy, and therefore winds wire along these natural flow lines. The shears between adjacent currents create a complex overall magnetic field, whose properties are as yet not well understood. But since wound coils are essential to motors, generators, transformers, and numerous electronic devices, we should not be surprised to discover that new 3D geometries for coil windings have the potential to revolutionize all of these components, and possibly provide a model for the electron itself.

The quantum Hall step resistance effect was discovered by von Klitzing in 1980 and required superconducting low temperatures and high magnetic fields. In 1988, van Wees and Wharam discovered that step resistances can be produced at room temperature and no magnetic field, in a one degree nanowire conductor a few atoms thick. Here we demonstrate that quantum step resistances can be obtained by pulling up a temporary liquid (mercury) metallic nanowire. The quantum step resistances can be measured with a simple Quantum Step Resistance Ohmmeter of my design. The room temperature quantum step resistances are due to Cooper pairs of electrons giving an R=h/2ie² Ohms, where h is Planck constant, (e) is the fundamental charge and i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. The meter scale is marked at 12.9K, 6.45K, 4.3K, 3.22K, 2.58k, 2.15K, 1.84K, and 1.161K Ohm.

Charles W. Lucas, Jr. and David L. Bergman built a model of the atom using Faraday’s and Maxwell’s electromagnetic-field theory (which accounts for Newton’s three Laws of Motion). These properties are demonstrated to be the result of electromagnetic forces working in the spinning-ring model of the atom. The proof of a model’s ability to represent the atom is whether accurate predictions can be made from it. The spinning-ring model has “correctly predicted features of the periodic table of elements and the spins of all 1,500 nuclides that have been measured”.

In the model shown, white Styrofoam rings represent the electrons (larger and 12 inches in diameter) and protons (smaller and 6 inches in diameter). Dark wires represent the magnetic flux fields that prevents the atom from collapsing by repelling each other with magnetic fields of the same polarity. I will also display several other models related to Bergman-Lucas ring theory.

The atlas of Atomic Nuclear Structure – a major outcome from BSM-SG unified theory shows the derived superfine material structure of the elementary particles and the geometrical arrangement of protons and neutrons in the atomic nuclei. It suggests explanations for following problems:

• Structure of the electron defining its quantum mechanical interactions with the space fabrics
• How the 3D structures of atomic nuclei define the electron shells and valences?
• The nuclear signature of Hund’s rule and Pauli exclusion principle
• Why Lanthanides and Actinides form separate rows in Periodic Table?
• Why some isotopes are unstable?
• Why elements with higher atomic numbers decay mostly by alpha decay?
• How the atoms are arranged in molecules and what defines the angular positions of the bonds corresponding to VSEPR models in Chemistry?

Examples of BSM-SG atomic models applications: simple molecules O₂,O₃, CO₂; conformations of C₄H₄ molecule; H₂O molecule and its unknown state that probably is the Brown Gas; carbon atom arrangements in nanotubes and graphene; signatures of BSM atomic models obtained by electron microscopy.

Neal Adams will be displaying his animations on the expanding earth and other bodies in the solar system. He will also be talking about his Prime Matter Particles theory.

It is possible to account for the correlations of polarization entanglement by means of advanced waves along the light trajectories linking detectors with the source of entangled light. If the advanced wave connections occur in the present (and do not involve backward in time causation) a special reference frame is required for space-like separations of the detectors. This account is testable by blocking the light trajectories after the correlated light leaves the source and before it reaches the detectors. The experiment shown here is currently being conducted by Yanhua Shih’s group at the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC). It includes using a pockels cell driven by a 100 kHz driver and separating the correlated light source from the detectors by using 3 km of optical fibers.

This set of demonstrations is designed to illustrate what’s wrong with science paradigm and how to fix it. It visually delineates corrections to the philosophy and science of such luminaries as Archimedes, Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. Following representative examples are for illustration only.

1. Corrections to the first law of motion specifically delineating the semantic difference between Newton’s “Body at Rest” as used in the first law of motion named after him and Our Pal’s “Dead-End” or “STOP”
2. How Engineers made GPS work by trial and error in spite of the wrong science.
3. Demonstration of the SWIFT-ANSWER software (US 4,270,182)

The presenter and demonstrator OUR PAL is an attorney, author, inventor and engineer listed in Who’s Who in the World for inventing and prosecuting the first software patent ever.

This technology is based on a process pioneered by John Milewski and others, and provides a way of quickly assaying ore concentrates using a commercial grade microwave oven.

The Gulf oil situation is a tragic example that might have been prevented if drillers had been aware of how Earth creates its tremendous volumes of hydrocarbon fuels (gas, oil, coal). In brief: Methane gas molecules (CH₄) trapped in Earth's crust polymerize (link together) to form petroleum. The degree of polymerization is a function of temperature, high pressure and time; as it progresses, the ratio of gas to oil decreases along with decreasing pressure, if not connected to a higher-pressured source of gas. When drilled into, the higher pressure can exceed the capability of the blow-out preventer.

A tessellation is a "space filler", or regular repeated geometric pattern that completely fills a space. In 2D space, the equilateral triangle, square and regular hexagon all qualify as tessellations or space fillers, but the regular pentagon does not. In 3D space, the only Platonic solid (equal edges and faces) that fills space is the cube. However, there are several other 3D shapes that completely fill space, as this demonstration will show. But the really fascinating discovery is that most of the 3D tessellations are related to each other, actually categorized by families of shapes. Moreover each tessellating shape corresponds to a particular packing structure, like body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), or hexoganal close packing (HCP), etc. This demonstration will also explore the duality between the sphere centers of several packing schemes and the vertices of the tessellating shapes that enclose them (aka the Voronoi points). Exhausting the possible packing structures patterns may provide a clue toward determining various characteristics of materials and chemical bonds.

Documented cycles range widely in diversity. They include fluctuations in the stock market, commodity prices, economic activity, wars, civilizations, global climate, ice-ages, geological formations, and abundance of life on Earth. This book examines all of these cycles, plus more. In addition, the Unified Cycle Theory makes predictions about our universe. If you're interested in history, science, geology, physics, astronomy, climatology, biology, mathematics, psychology, sociology, philosophy, economics, or investment theory, then read on. The theory includes portions of all of these academics. Furthermore, this book covers cycles ranging as short as 27 days to ones spanning billions of years. The evidence comes from a variety of scientific, academic, and business sources - which this book methodically details. In spite of the great advances in identifying cycles, this increased knowledge yielded little in the way of providing a consensus about why they occur. This book attempts to correct that shortcoming. These chapters step back, dispose all preconceptions, reexamine the wealth of information available, and use deductive processes to formulate a new theory.

Two interlocking magnetic currents create a magnetic diffraction pattern or "field." This magnetic field exhibits a concentrated flux of only one polarity. The two interlocking magnetic currents were inspired by the "Marriage Symbol." The marriage symbol is in turn inspired by the number 1/0. This number is also inspired by the idea that Nikolas of Cusa called "the coincidence of opposites," better known in Cultural Anthropology as "balanced reciprocity."

Time permitting, I will also demonstrate the "Wheels of Destiny" technology based on the Marriage symbol.

The gold assaying and silver melting processes are very similar to the process of assaying black sand into Rhodium and Irridium. The equipment is the same. I observed several anomalies during these new and early assay attempts. I believe that these four anomalies all have the same cause, which is that these new metals are not fully converted from the Ormus state. The first anomaly is the disappearance of the first two beads overnight, the second is that two beads occurred during the cupelling process and the third is that these assays seem to be producing two different metal beads in the same assaying experiment -- usually, in conventional assays, they alloy into one compound bead. I have not heard of any of these things happening before in the typical assay process. Finally, the specific gravity of these new "metals" is quite low when compared to the type of platinum group metals I believe them to be. My explanation for the observations above is that the metal beads that formed in two distinct shapes that were separate from each other, in the bottom of the cupel, were only partly converted Ormus materials. Please visit The Process of Assaying Black Sands.

In the 80's and 90's David Hudson coined the acronym ORME for "Orbitally Rearranged Monatomic Elements", which he defined as a new state of matter. He demonstrated, through very detailed experiments and multiple testing, that at least 13 transition elements (Co, Ni, Cu, Ru, Rh, Pd Ag, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg) in the center of the periodic table, can exist in a heretofore-unidentified state of matter, chemically inert and likely monatomic. Conventional chemistry assumes that all reactions take place by the action of outer electrons, but Hudson deduced that transition elements existing in a monatomic state do not necessarily share or swap electrons with their near neighbors as in a crystal lattice, but instead become ORMEs elements.

Outer electrons of ORMEs elements form Cooper pairs and become whirlwinds of light rotating at super speeds around the atom, and thus lose all conventional chemical reactivity. The whirling electrons that have become light set up a Meissner antimagnetic field, which causes a levitating force against the earth magnetic field and the element effectively loses 4/9's of its weight. According to Hudson, at this same time the nucleus becomes high spin and shrinks to about 1/3 of its original size and distorts to an oblong shape. When in this state as a single atom it should be a very small and very chemically inert atomic gas.

We postulate that the free atom Ormus forms of these 13 transition atoms are chemically inert gas, very small in relation to their masses and surrounded by a strong antimagnetic field. We suspect that our atmosphere contains a significant amount of these gases, causing them to blend into our atmosphere and be easily mistaken for other gases such as argon, nitrogen and CO2, with similar weight and vapor pressure. Please visit ORMUS is a Gas.

Legend claims that Galileo stood atop the Tower of Pisa and dropped two rocks of differing weights, and found that they both fell at the same rate.  But what if one rock were magnetic and the other not?  Would they still fall at the same rate?  Come and see for yourself as we replicate an experiment first performed by the late Boyd Bushman.  Decide for yourself if there exists a connection between magnetism and gravity.